by Barry on October 14, 2009
This article, a photo essay and accompanying film, appeared in the inaugural issue of Practical Matters. I present a collage of images and text around the themes of conviviality and the ‘return of the repressed’ to Lutherstadt Wittenberg, with ‘repressed here referring to the conviviality, freedom, and spontaneity characteristic of carnival traditions. The accompanying film thickens the collage. The piece is narrative- rather than argument-driven. My aim is to tell a story, or rather show or depict a story—a story about the loss and recovery of mimetic traditions, in particular traditions associated with carnival. Among the elements presented here in ensemble form are Renaissance-era carnival, high unemployment in the former East Germany, systems of state surveillance, the paintings of Peter Breugel, play, the state of the contemporary public sphere, modernity, Spielleute, conviviality, imagination, and mimesis.
Read the full article
by Barry on October 12, 2009
Journal article – Journal of Religion and Popular Culture
Abstract: The “war on terror” launched by the Bush administration in the wake of 9/11 is disturbing for many reasons, not least of which is the brutality with which this war has been carried out. A second feature of the American response to 9/11 to draw fire both at home and abroad is the “cowboy” swagger of President Bush and the Bush administration. A third point of criticism argues that 9/11 offered the Bush administration the perfect excuse to test the doctrine of “preemptive war” as a tool in the extension of American control of territory rich in oil reserves. These three features of the war on terror—its brutality, the cowboyism of the White House, and a context of American empire—are interrelated phenomena, and they are the product, at least in part, of the frontier myth that informs American popular culture and civil religion. The rhetoric, visual, and performative culture of the Bush Administration vis-à-vis the contemporary war of terror has too many resemblances to earlier “wars on savagery” to ignore. There is a new frontier to be conquered, and the Bush administration overtly mythologizes, ritualizes, frames, and sells this new “war” with reference to an earlier one, namely, the Indian wars.
[slideshow id=6]
Read the article